JFK's Death - Why it matters

A celebrated  academic in the USA, Noam Chomsky, author of many political works and well respected in establishment circles, has commented derisively  "Why does the death of President Kennedy matter - who  cares ?"
In an effort to answer that question, all the efforts that I have read concerning the importance of John F. Kennedy center on his efforts for peace and the courage he displayed in pursuing it. That is what he did during his life.  But the question before us is -- Why is it important for the world to know the who, what and why concerning his death. Do those facts impact what we think and do today?

Before you answer the question or consider my suggestions, two writings on the subject are well worth the time - one easy read by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. , and one by James W. Douglass.  Douglass has written a definitive, well documented work entitled "JFK and the Unspeakable ". From what we  have experienced domestically since  9/11 in the so-called"War on Terror", you may even for the first time, recognize similarities in officialdom's response to national tragedy. On November 22, 1963,  the perpetrators sought to carry out a televised assassination event and then successfully deflect the blame in the minds of the American people by offering a convincing interpretation of what they had seen-- "the work of a lone gunman".

Some background :
Fresh from WWII, the military leaders of the western world apparently could not conceive, that they could ever lose a war. WWII had also necessitated building a huge arms infrastructure in factories and research establishments, and if the business was to continue to be profitable, it would demand a constant flow of tax money to pay for weapons research and production. The prospect of imminent war was therefore a requirement for the weapons industry. President Eisenhower, the commanding  general of WWII, was elected president in 1952 with  industry support, and if no other critical comment sticks, he was guilty of complicity in failing to  successfully oppose arms industry jingoism.
However at the very end of his presidency, in his departure speech, with a correct premonition of the danger, he warned that America's greatest threat was not the Soviets, but the Military Industrial Complex. Without naming them, these were powerful agencies within the US government and military who JFK was to discover, believed that if they could persuade the President to convert the Cold War to Hot, they could defeat communism, and 30 million American dead on the first day would be an OK price to pay. 

As a teenager, I lived through the period, and as frightening as it was to hear almost daily that the Russian bombers would come over the north pole to incinerate us, it is even more sobering now to  learn, that  American Generals were bent on waging a nuclear war, solely because they perceived a temporary nuclear advantage.  It is no exaggeration then, that we owe much to President Kennedy and his equal on the other side of the world, Nikita  Kruschev -- for as  history now records, the weapons themselves did not deter war . -  Only the will power of these two lonely men.

Additionally, the threat of Communism was so "all consuming" to this era, that on the 18th of June 1948, National Security Directive 10/2 was issued by President Truman authorizing the CIA to carry out covert activities in the national interest including assassinations without receiving executive branch approval. The doctrine arguing for this departure from  moral law was called "Plausible Denial"*  and 15 years later, it would be employed against President Kennedy.
 
Summary:  "Why should the Death of JFK matter now--  to  all of us ?
Six  items:
1. The doctrine of "plausible  denial"* was indeed used against the American  people in the highly visible, heart-wrenching assassination of a beloved US president - John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
2. The same National Security Council Directive 10/2, 18 June 1948, is still in effect.
3. It has taken 50 years for a totally believable hypothesis on Kennedy's death to reach me - even though I was an eyewitness to that time.
4. An alert populace, with a current knowledge of the doctrine of "Plausible Denial"*  plus "alternate media" journalists, could conceivably deter or for-shorten** the time to expose international crimes and "false  flag" events.
5. Some of the persons responsible for the Oklahoma Bombing in 1995, 9/11 in 2001,  the Boston Marathon bombing  and others, may still be at large, and finally...
6. Successful international exposure, trial and conviction, is the best deterrent against future crimes of this nature or "false flag" events.

* Plausible Denial  - in my understanding, is justification to override or deny the Biblical 10 Commandments for reasons perceived to be in the national interest. 
** "Can for-Shorten" - Unsubstantiated trends indicate that agencies subscribing to plausible denial are becoming less confident of their ability to pull off a false  flag event, because the alternate media is not under their  control.

Bitcoin -- A Power Transfer ?

In the face of unrestrained money creation, most every one agrees that Gold and Silver are a currency lifebelt, yet the countries that are driving our financial system down by inflating the currency, are also suppressing the price of gold . The more money they print, the higher the gold price should be, but the opposite  is true. It  either stays the same or it declines in  real terms. It is reasonable therefore to assume that when the  scheduled implosion of fiat currencies does take place, the control and pricing of  the physical metal will certainly be controlled by the banking powers. It seems to  be the nature of things. With their police and military power, they  control the physical  things.

Enter Bitcoin  2009.
When  you view all three You Tube presentations ,  you will  have touched on all the  high points. 
Sophie , the  RT interviewer is  initially skeptical,  but  you can see that the  Developer Amir has the practical  answers as well as a passionate freedom motive. Max Keiser and Stacey Herbert have thoughts  you should know on the future of Bitcoin in the financial markets. The Le Web Panel is a little more  low key although Roger Ver is passionate  about Bitcoin being the means of bypassing the fiat currency situation and the agenda of the banks and the NWO.  It's fairly obvious given any measure of their performance, that the Federal Reserve and  their associates  want us to continue watching them use quantitative easing and other flawed financial instruments to destroy our purchasing power as well as our means of generating wealth. The philosophy behind Bitcoin is, in reality the means of  getting off that sinking ship via an open source, self regulating computer based  currency .

Bitcoin today is  $325     A year ago  a Bitcoin was $25 
What does that tell you ?  It's  rapidly catching on.

The interesting thing to me in all of this is that we have excellent researchers in the alternate  media like James Corbett and  others who  are eloquently defining the terms under which we are progressively being controlled.  However, they have no specific answers on how to turn this around other than raising awareness.  The answer in broad terms is right under our noses for the cost in using fiat MONEY, is many of our common law freedoms. The establishment creates money "out of nothing" with their banks and financial institutions in every mall, and we pay for it through inflation and taxes. For much less cost then, it appears that given time, we, the people could have a versatile currency on the Internet that eliminates the evils of the banking cartel, and that provides for a fair and just means of exchange.

Think about  it -- as Bitcoin  spreads  wider and  wider, we would be gradually replacing the present "fiat" system with a low cost money system that does not allow for centralized control, we take away the power the cartel has to put puppet regimes in place that create the institutions and powers that control us. This transfer of power can be non violent. It need not be another Lexington where guns faced guns.  It is really the transfer of power brought about  "by leaving the room ". As more and more people and businesses leave fiat currency and its control, the taxing power of big government declines, the banks have less and less customers,  and before too long, there is no one left to plunder.
Idealistic you say -  It's  true !  But how many choices do we have ?  If we stay under the cartel's money system--  they will yo-yo  the system until we are so poor that we have no choice but to accept a One World currency under the cartel's control.

Could an evolving Bitcoin become the rallying point for a transfer of power?

If I Blog- Will anybody listen?

 In the film  "Shall we Dance " actress Susan Sarandon says that a faithful marriage is good because our lives need a witness. However, the coming of the internet and social media has made it possible for an individual to make the whole world potential witnesses. What's the rationale then to Blog, or.....without reservation or anonymity, comment on a Blog article?

Here's a list of Pros and Cons to help us decide.
Pros-                                                 Cons-
You write well ....                            But you fear you have nothing significant to say;
You want to share your feelings .... Everyone has them - yours are now public;
Your friends want to  know....         You may have fewer if you get involved;
You are selling something....           Buyers will tell the world about you- good and bad;
Record for Conscience sake-      On some issues, admirable if you do,
                                                                      and Complicit if you don't.        

If you're pragmatic, you will be uncomfortable, with all this and want to curl up with your privacy and let the trend blow by. At first glance, I would agree, but perhaps we're missing an  opportunity if we do. Arguably, the majority of the pros are an exercise of our vanity, which is irrelevant, ....and that's OK.

But should  we miss the first chance in history to exercise conscience on a truly grand scale, and to be on record for what we think is right and true ?
2500 years ago a prophet name Ezekiel was tagged the "Watchman on the wall".  (Ezekiel 33)  In our age, if truth is a casualty, who will regret most when it's time to give an account ?

 "Free Airspace"  has moved to  http://helofreeairspace.blogspot.com/

The Landing of Noah's Ark

The Landing of Noah's Ark

One of the most puzzling things about the human spirit is how frequently men fail to learn the lessons of history that prevent their repeating  the same  mistakes in the future.  This trend stretches all the way from rebuilding in flood  zones to ignoring moral laws that either shorten the present life, and/ or extend to indefinite duration, the misery of the next.

The Bible, in recounting the  history of  the Jews, contains the most spectacular examples of all  time.  The Jewish people, to whom were committed the laws and the oracles of God, the timely miracles of deliverance in the Exodus, the original Temple, as well as the lineage and birth of the most important man to ever visit history -- the God-Man Jesus Christ, -- all these have failed miserably to persuade them to take advantage of repeated special revelation. In fact, rather than put-up with prophets who warned them of the consequences for disobedience and  spiritual adultery, they killed them for delivering  prophecies that consistently worked out to their detriment.

 I conclude therefore, that the Jews are the chosen instrument to display the condition in which all men, apart from electing grace, find  themselves  -  blind enmity for the triune God.  Naturally, -- we want none of  it ! Witness the Jews, who with Moses and the prophets, had the inside track and every incentive to revel in their knowledge, but to date, except for a  remnant, it has been to no avail. It is "a given" then, that God, in the past, has judged man in his rebellion and it is therefore prophetically certain, that  He will do so on a much grander scale in the future.

I think it's worth studying the existing  evidence of  historical judgments in order to undo where  possible, the prevailing ignorance and to promote a reason for "reverential fear". Contrary to  human scholarship, the first flood  zone was the whole world - the Genesis Flood!  Earthly  scholarship has  done its very best to  invent whole systems of thought that run contrary, possessing  only one fundamental spiritual tenet -- "There is no God who judges! " But I draw a different conclusion, not  just from the Biblical record, but  from  personal investigation  of the evidence which remains to this day in eastern Turkey. 

When you  visit The Landing of Noah's Ark , note the evidence does exist, concluding that sometime in the past, a "Drift Ship "  of  discernible  proportions, floated on a calm sea, 450 M above the future village of Arzap (Touch the Earth) Turkey. It was there,  that Captain Noah made a decision to release the remaining drogue stones (sea anchors)  which had protected the Ark from rollover on mountainous seas, and  to  "make way", under power,  towards a visible landfall- The Wall of Heaven.